{
  "name": "AZ HomeShield Arizona New-Home Warranty Knowledge Base",
  "site": "https://azhomeshield.com",
  "purpose": "Fact-checked educational reference for Arizona new-build homeowners and AI agents. Not legal advice.",
  "lastReviewed": "2026-08-07",
  "primaryJurisdiction": "Arizona, United States",
  "disclaimer": "Educational summary of publicly available information. Verify against current statutes, your purchase/warranty contracts, and qualified professionals before acting.",
  "humanNavNote": "Public site navigation emphasizes Learn, Builders, Neighborhoods, Tools, Support, and app download CTAs. Machine-readable routes below are for crawlers and agents and are not primary consumer navigation.",
  "preferredAgentEntrypoints": [
    "https://azhomeshield.com/llms.txt",
    "https://azhomeshield.com/llms-full.txt",
    "https://azhomeshield.com/knowledge/arizona-warranty-facts.json",
    "https://azhomeshield.com/knowledge/arizona-builders.json",
    "https://azhomeshield.com/knowledge/arizona-neighborhoods.json",
    "https://azhomeshield.com/.well-known/llms.txt"
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "id": "roc-two-year-window",
      "claim": "Arizona new-home buyers have a two-year ROC complaint window from close of escrow or occupancy, whichever occurs first.",
      "status": "verified",
      "summary": "A.R.S. § 12-1365 requires new-home sale contracts to notify buyers they may file a written ROC complaint within two years after close of escrow or actual occupancy, whichever occurs first, for specified contractor violations under A.R.S. §§ 32-1155 and 32-1154.",
      "commonMisread": "This administrative window is not the same as a builder’s one-year workmanship booklet, and missing it does not automatically erase every civil claim.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "A.R.S. § 12-1365",
          "url": "https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01365.htm",
          "kind": "statute"
        },
        {
          "label": "Arizona ROC — File a Formal Complaint",
          "url": "https://roc.az.gov/file-complaint",
          "kind": "agency"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "pda-notice-and-repair",
      "claim": "Before many civil dwelling actions, Arizona’s Purchaser Dwelling Act requires written notice and a repair opportunity.",
      "status": "verified",
      "summary": "Under A.R.S. §§ 12-1361–1366, a purchaser generally must give the seller detailed written notice by certified mail before filing a dwelling action (life/safety exceptions apply). After notice, the seller may inspect; the purchaser must make the home available within ten days of an inspection request. The seller has sixty days after receipt of notice to send a good-faith written response. If the seller does not respond within sixty days, the purchaser may file. Failure to follow the statute can lead to dismissal, and limitations/repose periods are tolled during the notice/repair process for noticed defects.",
      "commonMisread": "Some secondary websites still say buyers must wait “90 days before filing.” Current A.R.S. § 12-1363 centers on certified-mail notice, inspection access, and a 60-day seller response — verify the live statute text rather than older secondary summaries.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "A.R.S. § 12-1362",
          "url": "https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01362.htm",
          "kind": "statute"
        },
        {
          "label": "A.R.S. § 12-1363",
          "url": "https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01363.htm",
          "kind": "statute"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "pda-not-flat-ninety-days",
      "claim": "Current A.R.S. § 12-1363 does not use a flat “90 days’ notice before suing” rule as its core timing framework.",
      "status": "verified",
      "summary": "The live statute requires certified-mail notice with reasonable detail, inspection access within ten days of a request, and a sixty-day seller response window. Secondary blogs and some builder-contract explainers still compress this into “90 days’ written notice”; that shorthand should not override azleg.gov text.",
      "commonMisread": "Treating a warranty-portal ticket alone as Purchaser Dwelling Act notice, or waiting passively for 90 days without tracking the statutory response deadline.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "A.R.S. § 12-1363",
          "url": "https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01363.htm",
          "kind": "statute"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "statute-of-repose-eight-years",
      "claim": "Many Arizona construction contract and implied-warranty claims face an eight-year statute of repose from substantial completion, with a limited ninth-year path for certain late discoveries.",
      "status": "verified",
      "summary": "A.R.S. § 12-552 generally bars contract-based actions against developers/design/construction professionals more than eight years after substantial completion. If injury to real property occurs in the eighth year, or a latent defect is not discovered until the eighth year, an action may be brought within one year of that injury/discovery, but not more than nine years after substantial completion. The statute does not shorten a longer express written warranty and does not apply to personal injury or death actions. As of 2026-08-07, the live azleg.gov text still shows this eight/nine-year framework — including after review of 2026 SB 1450’s introduced condo-focused proposal.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "A.R.S. § 12-552",
          "url": "https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/00552.htm",
          "kind": "statute"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sb-1641-repose-shortening-did-not-enact",
      "claim": "Claims that Arizona SB 1641 shortened the construction-defect statute of repose from eight years to four years conflict with the live A.R.S. § 12-552 text.",
      "status": "verified",
      "summary": "SB 1641 (56th Legislature) proposed cutting many A.R.S. § 12-552 contract-based construction claims from eight years to four and adding condominium owner-vote hurdles. Named secondary analysis (Gottlieb Law, Dec 2025) reports the bill did not become law. A January 2026 industry “year in review” PDF incorrectly stated SB 1641 passed. Primary verification is the live statute page on azleg.gov, which still uses the eight-year / limited ninth-year framework as of 2026-08-07. Treat “Arizona cut defect claims to four years” as a myth until the statute text itself changes.",
      "commonMisread": "Treating introduced bill text or secondary PDFs as enacted law, or collapsing the ROC two-year window into a nonexistent four-year civil deadline.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "A.R.S. § 12-552 (live text)",
          "url": "https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/00552.htm",
          "kind": "statute"
        },
        {
          "label": "SB 1641 introduced text (56th Leg., 2nd Reg.)",
          "url": "https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/56leg/2r/bills/sb1641p.htm",
          "kind": "statute"
        },
        {
          "label": "Gottlieb Law — SB 1641 didn’t pass (Dec 4, 2025)",
          "url": "https://gottlieblawaz.com/2025/12/04/sb-1641-reveals-arizona-construction-defect-reform/",
          "kind": "secondary"
        },
        {
          "label": "BBG Law Year-End 2025 PDF (incorrectly reports enactment — caution)",
          "url": "https://bbglaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/BBG-Advisory_Arizona-Law-Year-In-Review_Year-End-2025.pdf",
          "kind": "secondary"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sb-1450-condo-repose-proposal-not-enacted",
      "claim": "2026 Arizona SB 1450 proposes a condominium-only five-year statute of repose and related association hurdles, but it is not live law as of 2026-08-07.",
      "status": "verified",
      "summary": "SB 1450 (57th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session 2026) introduced text would keep the general eight-year A.R.S. § 12-552 framework for most property while adding a five-year contract repose (limited sixth-year latent path) for condominiums regulated under Title 33, Chapter 9, plus condo-specific notice/remedy procedures and a two-thirds unit-owner vote before many association defect suits. The introduced draft lists an effective date after December 31, 2026 if enacted. As of 2026-08-07, live azleg.gov § 12-552 still lacks that condo five-year subsection, and secondary legislative trackers still described the bill as awaiting Senate First Reading. Do not confuse 2026 SB 1450 with the unrelated 2025 SB 1450 scrap-metal study committee bill.",
      "commonMisread": "Treating an introduced condo reform bill as a statewide five-year deadline for all new homes, or assuming introduced text is already chaptered.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "A.R.S. § 12-552 (live text)",
          "url": "https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/00552.htm",
          "kind": "statute"
        },
        {
          "label": "SB 1450 introduced text (57th Leg., 2nd Reg.)",
          "url": "https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/57leg/2R/bills/SB1450P.htm",
          "kind": "statute"
        },
        {
          "label": "CHDB Law — SB 1450 legislative update",
          "url": "https://www.chdblaw.com/legislative-update/sb-1450/",
          "kind": "secondary"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "implied-warranty-nonwaivable",
      "claim": "Arizona’s implied warranty of workmanship and habitability for new homes generally cannot be waived by purchase-contract disclaimer.",
      "status": "verified",
      "summary": "In Zambrano v. M & RC II LLC (Arizona Supreme Court, 2022), the Court held that a builder generally cannot disclaim or waive the implied warranty of workmanship and habitability in the purchase agreement. Express limited warranties still matter for claim processing, but they are not the only legal layer.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "Zambrano v. M & RC II LLC (Ariz. 2022)",
          "url": "https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/supreme-court/2022/cv-21-0205-pr.html",
          "kind": "court"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "express-warranty-is-contractual",
      "claim": "A builder’s limited warranty booklet is contractual; its timelines and exclusions are not automatically the full measure of Arizona remedies.",
      "status": "verified",
      "summary": "National-builder packages commonly split short workmanship, longer systems, and longer structural periods, with claim portals and exclusions. Those terms control the contractual process, but Arizona also provides ROC complaint rights, Purchaser Dwelling Act prerequisites for many civil actions, implied-warranty doctrine, and repose-period frameworks.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "A.R.S. § 12-1365",
          "url": "https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/01365.htm",
          "kind": "statute"
        },
        {
          "label": "A.R.S. § 12-552(G) (express warranty not shortened)",
          "url": "https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/00552.htm",
          "kind": "statute"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "arbitration-often-enforceable",
      "claim": "Mandatory arbitration clauses in Arizona new-home contracts are commonly enforced and can move defect disputes out of court.",
      "status": "verified",
      "summary": "Arizona recognizes written arbitration agreements under the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act framework, and federal arbitration policy also often applies. Large Arizona defect fights (including Sun City Grand / Del Webb) proceeded in arbitration and later court confirmation. Arbitration changes the forum; it does not erase the need for evidence or statutory notice/repair compliance where applicable.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "RSN Law overview of Arizona construction ADR (2025)",
          "url": "https://www.rsnlawaz.com/2025/12/29/alternative-dispute-resolution-in-arizona-construction-mediation-vs-arbitration/",
          "kind": "secondary"
        },
        {
          "label": "Roberts / Del Webb Court of Appeals materials",
          "url": "https://cases.justia.com/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-unpublished/2015-1-ca-cv-13-0119.pdf?ts=1424793610",
          "kind": "court"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sun-city-grand-del-webb",
      "claim": "Sun City Grand homeowners obtained a multi-million-dollar arbitration award against Del Webb that Arizona courts later confirmed.",
      "status": "verified",
      "summary": "Contemporaneous reporting and court-linked materials describe an arbitration award of roughly $7.88M damages plus about $5.77M fees/costs to 460 homeowners, later affirmed on confirmation in Roberts v. Del Webb Communities, Inc. (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015). Related proceedings involved additional households. Allegations included soils/slab, windows, stucco, and other workmanship issues.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "Builder Magazine (2012)",
          "url": "https://www.builderonline.com/building/regulation-policy/pulte-charged-13-6-million-in-defect-suit_o",
          "kind": "news"
        },
        {
          "label": "Insurance Journal (2012)",
          "url": "https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/midwest/2012/03/07/238559.htm",
          "kind": "news"
        },
        {
          "label": "Roberts v. Del Webb (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015 PDF)",
          "url": "https://cases.justia.com/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-unpublished/2015-1-ca-cv-13-0119.pdf?ts=1424793610",
          "kind": "court"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "abc15-top-builder-roc-tallies",
      "claim": "ABC15 reported annual ROC complaint tallies for Arizona’s busiest production builders after querying the Registrar of Contractors.",
      "status": "reported",
      "summary": "ABC15’s Let Joe Know coverage cited RL Brown permit data (more than 82,000 Phoenix-metro permits across 2020–2022) and reported ROC complaint counts for General Residential Contractor licenses: Pulte 40, Meritage 36, Lennar Arizona 29, Taylor Morrison 22, and D.R. Horton 17 for the year queried. The outlet said a majority of complaints for those builders alleged poor workmanship and that many closed after issues were addressed. These are reported annual snapshots, not defect rates per home.",
      "commonMisread": "Treating absolute complaint counts as apples-to-apples quality rankings without considering permit volume, complaint disposition, or which legal entity appears on a buyer’s contract.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "ABC15 — New home construction boom / ROC complaints",
          "url": "https://www.abc15.com/news/let-joe-know/new-home-construction-boom-in-arizona-whos-behind-the-houses",
          "kind": "news"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "lennar-engels-roc-reporting",
      "claim": "ABC15 documented a Lennar homeowner ROC complaint path involving findings, repairs, reinspection, and a contested citation.",
      "status": "reported",
      "summary": "ABC15 reported that homeowners Jon and Jocelyn Engel filed an ROC complaint over framing, floors, and countertops in a Lennar-built home. The ROC found certain items out of compliance, ordered repairs, and later found some reinspected items still noncompliant. Reporting cited 18 complaints against Lennar’s general residential building license in 2023 (12 the prior year), with 16 of 18 fixed or closed, while a disputed master-bath countertop gap proceeded toward an administrative law judge after the ROC denied Lennar’s dismissal petition.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "ABC15 — Arizona couple’s Lennar / ROC dispute",
          "url": "https://www.abc15.com/news/let-joe-know/arizona-couples-issue-with-new-home-builder-to-be-settled-by-judge",
          "kind": "news"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "meritage-province-maricopa-reporting",
      "claim": "Local reporting has documented quality and HOA-transition disputes involving Meritage’s Province community in Maricopa.",
      "status": "reported",
      "summary": "12News covered Maricopa residents raising new-construction quality concerns, including pest intrusion and carbon monoxide worries. InMaricopa (June 21, 2025) reported a community meeting where residents criticized Meritage’s planned HOA exit amid unfinished infrastructure and reserve-funding concerns. Secondary sites repeat 12News-attributed ROC complaint tallies (e.g., 265 complaints / 81% workmanship); treat exact tallies as reported figures and verify live ROC records when needed.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "12News — Maricopa construction quality concerns",
          "url": "https://www.12news.com/article/money/consumer/maricopa-residents-raise-concerns-about-quality-of-new-construction/75-305f37f6-2eb3-4c05-ae20-d87f0a2e96c9",
          "kind": "news"
        },
        {
          "label": "InMaricopa — Province HOA transition meeting (June 21, 2025)",
          "url": "https://inmaricopa.com/were-fighting-deniability-province-meeting-boils-over-as-developer-exits/",
          "kind": "news"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "teravalis-floreo-launch-2025",
      "claim": "Teravalis (Buckeye), formerly Douglas Ranch, opened its first village Floreo with multiple production builders actively selling.",
      "status": "reported",
      "summary": "Howard Hughes Communities celebrated Teravalis’s grand opening in November 2025 and welcomed first Floreo residents. Developer materials describe a ~37,000-acre masterplan; the Teravalis site now markets up to ~113,000 homes at full buildout (earlier grand-opening materials used ~100,000). Floreo is the ~3,000-acre first village. Local and developer reporting list seven builders selling in the opening phase (including Century Communities, KB Home, Lennar, and Meritage). Treat unit counts as long-range entitlements, not near-term inventory.",
      "commonMisread": "A 100,000–113,000-home masterplan figure is not the number of homes available this year — ask for phase, plat, and remaining lots.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "Howard Hughes — Teravalis grand opening",
          "url": "https://communities.howardhughes.com/press-releases/howard-hughes-communities-celebrates-grand-opening-of-teravalis-in-phoenix-west-valley/",
          "kind": "news"
        },
        {
          "label": "Teravalis official site",
          "url": "https://www.teravalis.com/",
          "kind": "secondary"
        },
        {
          "label": "InBuckeye — Teravalis / Floreo launch",
          "url": "https://inbuckeye.com/featured/teravalis-opens-in-buckeye-begins-first-phase-toward-300k-future-residents/",
          "kind": "news"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "pulte-ag-earnest-money-2010",
      "claim": "In 2010, the Arizona Attorney General resolved consumer-fraud allegations against Pulte Home and Pulte Mortgage involving earnest-money and pre-qualification practices.",
      "status": "reported",
      "summary": "Contemporaneous reporting described an approximately $1.2 million resolution (penalties, costs, consumer refunds, and escrow) in which the companies admitted no fault but agreed to change disclosures and refund practices. The AG complaint PDF remains available via the Arizona Attorney General archive. This is consumer-protection history distinct from construction-defect arbitration outcomes.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "Arizona Daily Star — Pulte $1.2M settlement coverage",
          "url": "https://tucson.com/business/local/article_585f3ec3-9c83-5226-8580-8612c046fcb9.html",
          "kind": "news"
        },
        {
          "label": "Arizona AG — Pulte complaint PDF (2010 archive)",
          "url": "https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2018-10/PulteComplaint2010.pdf",
          "kind": "agency"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "meritage-sahuarita-arbor-reporting",
      "claim": "KVOA investigations reported Meritage homeowners in Sahuarita communities describing construction-quality problems and warranty delays.",
      "status": "reported",
      "summary": "News 4 Tucson reported Arbor (near Quail Creek) homeowners describing poor construction quality and slow one-year warranty response; Meritage acknowledged delays tied to labor/material shortages and described adding warranty staff. Later Sahuarita follow-ups described additional homeowner frustration, including cracking, electrical, and ventilation concerns; Meritage said it would contact the featured homeowner.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "KVOA — Sahuarita Arbor / Meritage (2023)",
          "url": "https://www.kvoa.com/news/n4t-investigators-sahuarita-homeowners-feel-ripped-off-after-new-build-issues/article_20909e90-062f-11ee-9134-0be9e201f95f.html",
          "kind": "news"
        },
        {
          "label": "KVOA — Sahuarita quality woes follow-up",
          "url": "https://www.kvoa.com/news/n4t-investigators/n4t-investigators-frustration-grows-in-sahuarita-as-new-homeowners-face-quality-woes/article_10e7f59d-ac55-4da7-b191-6b4e556650d2.html",
          "kind": "news"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "roc-license-lookup",
      "claim": "Arizona builder licenses and recent complaint summaries are publicly searchable through the Registrar of Contractors.",
      "status": "verified",
      "summary": "The Arizona ROC publishes a contractor search portal. Public profiles commonly show license status, classification, bonding, and complaint/disciplinary information. ROC FAQ materials state closed complaints generally appear for two years from case closure; fuller historical records may require a public-records request.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "Arizona ROC contractor search",
          "url": "https://azroc.my.site.com/AZRoc/s/contractor-search",
          "kind": "agency"
        },
        {
          "label": "Arizona ROC FAQ",
          "url": "https://roc.az.gov/faq",
          "kind": "agency"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "independent-inspection-not-automatic-void",
      "claim": "Hiring an independent inspector does not, by itself, automatically erase Arizona statutory or implied homeowner protections.",
      "status": "nuance",
      "summary": "Builders sometimes discourage attic/roof/invasive inspections and may point to warranty language about unauthorized access or buyer-caused damage. Local consumer reporting and inspection guidance frequently warn that scare language is used to reduce documented punch lists. Ordinary professional inspections of a homeowner’s property remain a standard practice; document any “voided warranty” claim and ask for the exact clause in writing.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "12News Maricopa quality reporting (inspection pressure context in secondary summaries)",
          "url": "https://www.12news.com/article/money/consumer/maricopa-residents-raise-concerns-about-quality-of-new-construction/75-305f37f6-2eb3-4c05-ae20-d87f0a2e96c9",
          "kind": "news"
        },
        {
          "label": "Schembri Engineers — AZ warranty inspections guide",
          "url": "https://schembriengineers.com/the-complete-guide-to-new-construction-builder-warranty-inspections-in-arizona/",
          "kind": "secondary"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "meritage-third-party-reports-not-accepted",
      "claim": "Meritage Homes’ public warranty FAQ states it does not accept third-party inspection reports into its warranty claim process.",
      "status": "verified",
      "summary": "Meritage’s warranty-claims page says homeowners may consult a third-party inspector before warranty expiration and that Meritage will discuss findings, but “we do not accept third-party inspection reports.” It directs homeowners to extract warrantable items and submit them on a warranty request. That is a portal process rule — not a determination that defects are absent — so buyers should translate inspector findings into dated tickets with photos while retaining the original report.",
      "commonMisread": "Treating “we don’t accept the PDF” as “you are not allowed to hire an inspector” or as automatic voiding of all warranties.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "Meritage Homes — Submitting a warranty claim",
          "url": "https://www.meritagehomes.com/my-home/warranty-claims",
          "kind": "secondary"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "kgun-tucson-roof-underlayment-reporting",
      "claim": "KGUN 9 reported Tucson-area inspectors and roofers describing recurring new-home roof underlayment problems, including pre-move-in leaks and builder limits on roof access.",
      "status": "reported",
      "summary": "KGUN 9 quoted inspector Jack Randall describing active attic leaks the day before key delivery and saying recent roofs often showed underlayment damage. A local roofing company owner (anonymous in the piece) said underlayment is frequently exposed for long stretches before tile is set. Randall estimated builders require no-roof-access agreements about 90% of the time. These are named local-news accounts, not adjudicated findings against a specific subdivision.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "KGUN 9 — new-home roofs raise concerns in Tucson",
          "url": "https://www.kgun9.com/news/local-news/builder-negligence-new-homes-roofs-raise-concerns-in-tucson",
          "kind": "news"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "roc-recovery-fund-caps",
      "claim": "Arizona’s Residential Contractors’ Recovery Fund is capped at $30,000 per individual award and $200,000 total liability per residential contractor license.",
      "status": "verified",
      "summary": "A.R.S. § 32-1132.01 sets a $30,000 maximum individual award and limits awards to actual damages to complete or repair residential work. A.R.S. § 32-1139 caps fund liability at $200,000 for any one residential contractor’s license; once that sum is paid, further fund recovery against that license is barred (with pro-rata rules when claims exceed the cap). ROC materials emphasize payment is not guaranteed and that bond/discipline or civil-judgment prerequisites often apply before a fund claim.",
      "commonMisread": "Treating the Recovery Fund as an automatic backup that replaces timely ROC complaints, documentation, or civil notice/repair requirements.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "A.R.S. § 32-1132.01",
          "url": "https://www.azleg.gov/ars/32/01132-01.htm",
          "kind": "statute"
        },
        {
          "label": "A.R.S. § 32-1139",
          "url": "https://www.azleg.gov/ars/32/01139.htm",
          "kind": "statute"
        },
        {
          "label": "Arizona ROC — Recovery Fund",
          "url": "https://roc.az.gov/recovery-fund",
          "kind": "agency"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "roc-recovery-fund-not-guarantee",
      "claim": "Eligibility for Arizona’s Recovery Fund requires a licensed residential contractor context and specific administrative or civil prerequisites; it does not guarantee payment.",
      "status": "verified",
      "summary": "A.R.S. § 32-1132 establishes the fund for eligible claimants damaged by licensed residential contractors. ROC guidance describes administrative claims after discipline and bond processing, and civil paths after judgment with Registrar notice and bond pursuit (A.R.S. § 32-1133). Commercial claimants are generally excluded; awards measure actual repair/completion damages subject to statutory caps.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "A.R.S. § 32-1132",
          "url": "https://www.azleg.gov/ars/32/01132.htm",
          "kind": "statute"
        },
        {
          "label": "A.R.S. § 32-1133",
          "url": "https://www.azleg.gov/ars/32/01133.htm",
          "kind": "statute"
        },
        {
          "label": "Arizona ROC — Recovery Fund",
          "url": "https://roc.az.gov/recovery-fund",
          "kind": "agency"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "brand-vs-legal-entity-roc",
      "claim": "Arizona ROC licenses attach to specific legal entities; sales brands like “Lennar” or “Meritage” may map to one or more differently named construction companies.",
      "status": "verified",
      "summary": "The Registrar of Contractors licenses contractors by business entity. Production builders commonly market under a brand while the purchase/warranty packet names a construction corporation or LLC. Buyers should match the contract entity and ROC number to the live ROC contractor search rather than assuming every similarly branded affiliate shares one license file.",
      "commonMisread": "Treating a brand-level complaint tally as a complete file for every affiliate license, or searching only the brand name and stopping at the first similar result.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "Arizona ROC contractor search",
          "url": "https://azroc.my.site.com/AZRoc/s/contractor-search",
          "kind": "agency"
        },
        {
          "label": "Arizona ROC — Before You Hire",
          "url": "https://roc.az.gov/before-hire",
          "kind": "agency"
        },
        {
          "label": "AZ HomeShield builders directory",
          "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/builders/",
          "kind": "secondary"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "inmaricopa-province-meritage-hoa-exit-2025",
      "claim": "InMaricopa reported a June 2025 Province (Maricopa) community meeting where residents criticized Meritage Homes’ planned HOA exit amid unfinished infrastructure complaints.",
      "status": "reported",
      "summary": "The June 21, 2025 InMaricopa account described resident frustration over roads, sidewalks, irrigation, and reserve funding as Meritage prepared to leave HOA control after finishing final homes. A reserve-study presenter was quoted that master reserves were about halfway funded at the start of 2024 and a Villas section about 35% funded. Meritage did not attend and had not commented to the outlet at publication. This is community/HOA-transition reporting, not an adjudicated finding about every Province home.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "InMaricopa — Province meeting / developer exit",
          "url": "https://inmaricopa.com/were-fighting-deniability-province-meeting-boils-over-as-developer-exits/",
          "kind": "news"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "taylor-morrison-sbtr-inspector-complaint-2024",
      "claim": "12News reported that Taylor Morrison’s 2024 SBTR complaint seeking discipline against viral Arizona inspector Cy Porter did not result in a license suspension; the investigator found no verifiable falsification of inspection videos.",
      "status": "reported",
      "summary": "Named local reporting (12News and follow-ups) describes Taylor Morrison filing a Board of Technical Registration complaint alleging harassing/falsified/bullying social posts and seeking suspension plus content removal. Coverage states the investigator found no evidence Porter lied in inspection videos and the board declined disciplinary action, issuing a non-disciplinary letter of concern about a separate satirical gas-leak audio clip. This is licensing-process reporting — not a court finding that every Taylor Morrison home is defective, and not permission to treat social videos as a substitute for your own inspection file.",
      "commonMisread": "Assuming a builder can “ban” independent inspections for Arizona buyers, or treating a viral inspector’s channel as proof about a specific lot without a dated report and warranty tickets.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "12News — board declines discipline after Taylor Morrison complaint",
          "url": "https://www.12news.com/article/news/local/valley/we-were-unable-to-find-any-verifiable-violations-viral-az-home-inspector-not-disciplined-after-taylor-morrison-files-complaint-against-him/75-2910b55f-57d0-4f8d-848d-d35a271bd69c",
          "kind": "news"
        },
        {
          "label": "AZ HomeShield — Taylor Morrison inspector complaint fact-check",
          "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/taylor-morrison-inspector-complaint/",
          "kind": "secondary"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "abc15-recovery-fund-proration-context",
      "claim": "ABC15 reported ROC leadership describing ~$25M in the Residential Contractors’ Recovery Fund, 8,000+ expected annual complaints, and frequent proration of validated awards to roughly 50–60 cents on the dollar when claims exceed a license’s $200,000 fund cap.",
      "status": "reported",
      "summary": "ABC15’s consumer segment quoted ROC Executive Director Tom Cole on fund size, complaint volume, and proration when many validated claims share one license’s statutory $200,000 fund ceiling (individual awards still capped at $30,000). Eligibility still requires a licensed contractor and typically primary-residence impact; unlicensed work generally does not qualify. Treat the proration figures as reported agency commentary illustrating why the fund is not a full-loss guarantee.",
      "commonMisread": "Treating Recovery Fund eligibility as automatic payment of the full repair estimate, or skipping the two-year ROC complaint / bond prerequisites because “the fund will cover it.”",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "ABC15 — Recovery Fund explainer",
          "url": "https://www.abc15.com/news/let-abc15-know/arizona-homeowners-can-recover-money-from-bad-contractor-jobs-heres-how",
          "kind": "news"
        },
        {
          "label": "Arizona ROC — Recovery Fund",
          "url": "https://roc.az.gov/recovery-fund",
          "kind": "agency"
        },
        {
          "label": "A.R.S. § 32-1132.01",
          "url": "https://www.azleg.gov/ars/32/01132-01.htm",
          "kind": "statute"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "verrado-estrella-active-selling-2026",
      "claim": "Verrado (Buckeye) and Estrella (Goodyear) remain among the West Valley’s actively selling multi-builder masterplans with publicly reported remaining buildout.",
      "status": "reported",
      "summary": "DMB/Verrado materials and mid-2025 sales coverage describe an ~8,800-acre community with roughly 12,500 homes at full buildout and ongoing Regent Hills / Victory 55+ sales. AZ Central (Jan 2025) reported Estrella at about 8,200 homes built (~50% of Estrella North) with 500+ Montecito homes planned and sales messaging into 2026 across seven active builders. Toll Brothers markets Beacon in Estrella with 129 homesites in Montecito. These are masterplan snapshots — lot counts, builders, and warranty entities change by phase.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "Verrado — sales rankings / buildout commentary",
          "url": "https://www.verrado.com/verrado-news/verrado-shines-in-national-sales-rankings/",
          "kind": "news"
        },
        {
          "label": "AZ Central — Estrella Montecito expansion (Jan 2025)",
          "url": "https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/southwest-valley/2025/01/13/estrella-goodyear-adding-500-new-homes/77411988007/",
          "kind": "news"
        },
        {
          "label": "Toll Brothers — Beacon in Estrella",
          "url": "https://www.tollbrothers.com/luxury-homes-for-sale/Arizona/Beacon-in-Estrella",
          "kind": "secondary"
        },
        {
          "label": "AZ HomeShield neighborhoods directory",
          "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/neighborhoods/",
          "kind": "secondary"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "gallery-hoa-hada-standing",
      "claim": "Arizona planned-community HOAs may bring Homeowners’ Association Dwelling Actions for construction defects in common areas they own and exteriors they are obligated to maintain, after meeting statutory HADA conditions.",
      "status": "verified",
      "summary": "In Gallery Community Association v. K. Hovnanian at Gallery, LLC (Ariz. Ct. App., 1 CA-CV 23-0375, filed Aug. 6, 2024), the Court of Appeals vacated summary judgment for the builder and held that A.R.S. § 33-2002 authorizes a planned-community HOA to pursue homeowners’ association dwelling actions — including claims framed as breach of the implied warranty of workmanship and habitability — for defects in common areas and in exteriors of individually owned units the HOA must maintain. HADA still requires member disclosure, a noticed meeting, board authorization, and Purchaser Dwelling Act notice/repair steps (A.R.S. § 12-1363). The Arizona Supreme Court granted review (CV-24-0252-PR); KVOA later reported a Supreme Court opinion affirming HOA standing with its own analysis — verify the live opinion on azcourts.gov before relying on “Supreme Court held” language.",
      "commonMisread": "Treating HADA as automatic standing without board process, or assuming an HOA lawsuit replaces individual ROC complaints, documentation, or warranty deadlines for each lot.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "Gallery v. K. Hovnanian (Ariz. Ct. App. 2024)",
          "url": "https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-published/2024/1-ca-cv-23-0375.html",
          "kind": "court"
        },
        {
          "label": "A.R.S. § 33-2002",
          "url": "https://www.azleg.gov/ars/33/02002.htm",
          "kind": "statute"
        },
        {
          "label": "Arizona Supreme Court OA case summary — CV-24-0252-PR",
          "url": "https://www.azcourts.gov/LinkClick.aspx?link=45%2F25+Summaries%2FApril+22%2C+2025+-+CV-24-0252-PR+-+Gallery+Community+v.+Hovnanian+-+OA+Case+Summary.pdf&portalId=0",
          "kind": "court"
        },
        {
          "label": "KVOA — HOAs can sue builders (reported Supreme Court outcome)",
          "url": "https://www.kvoa.com/news/arizona/arizona-hoas-can-now-sue-builders-over-defects-court-rules/article_f7bebf92-ee7d-4020-a3af-29764b13bc7a.html",
          "kind": "news"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "blossom-rock-apache-junction-active-2026",
      "claim": "Blossom Rock (Apache Junction) is an actively selling multi-builder masterplan with Phase 2 underway and publicly reported ~5,000-home buildout on ~1,400 acres.",
      "status": "reported",
      "summary": "Brookfield Residential’s Blossom Rock materials and AZ Central reporting describe a ~1,400-acre Apache Junction community planned for about 5,000 homes (part of the larger Superstition Vistas area alongside D.R. Horton’s Radiance). A May 7, 2026 Blossom Rock post said Meritage models were open and Lennar/Richmond American collections expanded, with Shea Homes and DRB Homes expected later in 2026. Shea’s Emblem at Blossom Rock page markets 53 homesites with model grand opening August 8, 2026. Aggregator listings for DRB at Blossom Rock (460 W Bonanza Trl) still showed coming-soon status into mid/late 2026. A March 2026 community post cited more than 500 home sales since the April 2024 opening. Treat unit counts as masterplan entitlements — match each lot’s builder entity and ROC number.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "Blossom Rock — new models / Meritage welcome (May 7, 2026)",
          "url": "https://www.blossomrock.com/life-at-blossom-rock/blog/posts-by-date/2026/may/new-homes-are-taking-root-at-blossom-rock/",
          "kind": "news"
        },
        {
          "label": "Shea Homes — Emblem at Blossom Rock (53 homes; models Aug 8, 2026)",
          "url": "https://www.sheahomes.com/new-homes/arizona/phoenix-area/apache-junction/emblem-at-blossom-rock",
          "kind": "secondary"
        },
        {
          "label": "Blossom Rock — two-year / 500+ sales commentary (Mar 2026)",
          "url": "https://www.blossomrock.com/life-at-blossom-rock/blog/posts-by-date/2026/march/blossom-rock-celebrates-two-years/",
          "kind": "news"
        },
        {
          "label": "AZ Central — Superstition Vistas / Blossom Rock plans",
          "url": "https://www.azcentral.com/story/money/real-estate/2023/08/11/more-than-10000-new-homes-planned-for-apache-junction-arizona/70571147007/",
          "kind": "news"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "artisan-at-asante-actively-selling-2026",
      "claim": "Artisan at Asante (Surprise) is an actively selling Northwest Valley masterplan addition with ~2,700 homesites marketed by Lennar, Pulte, and Taylor Morrison.",
      "status": "reported",
      "summary": "liveasante.com markets Artisan at Asante as now open with three builders: Lennar (from the high $300Ks), Pulte (from the mid $300Ks), and Taylor Morrison (from the high $300Ks). Community materials state Artisan will include about 2,700 homesites plus clubhouse/pool/park amenities inside the broader Asante masterplan. The Gallery clubhouse is marketed as open. Treat homesite counts as masterplan messaging — confirm phase inventory, HOA fees, and the ROC legal entity on each purchase packet.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "Artisan at Asante — official community site",
          "url": "https://www.liveasante.com/",
          "kind": "secondary"
        },
        {
          "label": "Pulte — Artisan at Asante",
          "url": "https://www.pulte.com/homes/arizona/phoenix/surprise/artisan-at-asante-211230",
          "kind": "secondary"
        },
        {
          "label": "Taylor Morrison — Artisan at Asante collections",
          "url": "https://www.taylormorrison.com/az/phoenix/artisan-at-asante-community-group",
          "kind": "secondary"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "verrado-highlands-tri-pointe-308-lots-2026",
      "claim": "In July 2026, DMB sold 308 Verrado Highlands lots for about $44.5M for Tri Pointe Homes product, with development expected late 2026 and sales projected around Q4 2027.",
      "status": "reported",
      "summary": "Greater Phoenix In Business, KTAR, and Phoenix Business Journal coverage describe DMB White Tank / DMB Associates selling ~99 acres (308 platted homesites) in Verrado Highlands (Buckeye) for approximately $44.5 million, capitalized with Kennedy Lewis for Tri Pointe Homes. Reporting calls it Arizona’s largest lot sale of 2026 to date and Verrado’s largest lot sale to date. Tri Pointe messaging anticipates development starting late 2026, models mid-2027, and sales in Q4 2027, with preliminary ~1,856–3,419 sq ft plans. Future sales timing can slip — verify before treating as current inventory.",
      "commonMisread": "Treating a lot-sale announcement as homes available for purchase in 2026, or assuming “Verrado” is a single ROC license for every village.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "In Business PHX — $44.5M / 308 Verrado Highlands homes",
          "url": "https://inbusinessphx.com/commercial-real-estate/44-5m-land-deal-paves-way-for-308-verrado-homes",
          "kind": "news"
        },
        {
          "label": "KTAR — DMB sells 308 Buckeye lots",
          "url": "https://ktar.com/arizona-real-estate/dmb-sells-308-home-lots-buckeye/5889928/",
          "kind": "news"
        },
        {
          "label": "Phoenix Business Journal — DMB / Tri Pointe Verrado lots (Jul 15, 2026)",
          "url": "https://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/news/2026/07/15/dmb-scottsdale-sells-verrado-home-lots.html",
          "kind": "news"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "radiance-alamar-active-selling-2026",
      "claim": "Radiance at Superstition Vistas (D.R. Horton, Apache Junction) and Alamar (Avondale; Brookfield / Lennar collections) remain actively selling Arizona new-home masterplans in 2026.",
      "status": "reported",
      "summary": "Brookfield’s Superstition Vistas overview states Blossom Rock and Radiance are both open and selling. Radiance is D.R. Horton’s ~1,400-acre sibling community marketed with 3–5 bedroom plans and quick-move inventory into 2026. Alamar in Avondale continues with Brookfield Highland Sage quick move-ins (2026 completions marketed) and Lennar Discovery collections near Alamar Park. Multi-builder masterplans still require lot-by-lot ROC entity matching.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "label": "Superstition Vistas — Blossom Rock & Radiance overview",
          "url": "https://superstition-vistas.brookfieldresidential.com/",
          "kind": "secondary"
        },
        {
          "label": "Lennar — Alamar Discovery (Avondale)",
          "url": "https://www.lennar.com/new-homes/arizona/phoenix/avondale/alamar-discovery",
          "kind": "secondary"
        },
        {
          "label": "Brookfield — Highland Sage at Alamar",
          "url": "https://www.brookfieldresidential.com/new-homes/arizona/phoenix/avondale/alamar/highland-sage",
          "kind": "secondary"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "articles": [
    {
      "id": "independent-inspections-vs-builder-warranty",
      "title": "“Don’t inspect the attic” — what Arizona buyers should know",
      "description": "Fact-check of builder pressure around independent inspections, roof/attic access limits, and warranty portals that refuse third-party reports — with Meritage and Tucson reporting context.",
      "category": "myths",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/independent-inspections-vs-builder-warranty/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 10,
      "featured": true
    },
    {
      "id": "arbitration-clauses-arizona-new-homes",
      "title": "Arbitration clauses in Arizona new-home contracts — what they change",
      "description": "How mandatory arbitration, class-action waivers, and Arizona’s Purchaser Dwelling Act interact when new-build defect disputes escalate.",
      "category": "process",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/arbitration-clauses-arizona-new-homes/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 7,
      "featured": false
    },
    {
      "id": "arizona-climate-new-home-defects",
      "title": "Arizona climate defect patterns new-build owners should watch",
      "description": "How heat cycling, monsoons, expansive soils, stucco, and HVAC load expose new-construction issues after closing in Arizona.",
      "category": "guide",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/arizona-climate-new-home-defects/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 7,
      "featured": true
    },
    {
      "id": "arizona-new-home-warranty-basics",
      "title": "Arizona new-home warranties — what builders say vs what the law provides",
      "description": "A fact-checked guide to express builder warranties, the Arizona ROC two-year complaint window, implied warranties, and the eight-year statute of repose.",
      "category": "guide",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/arizona-new-home-warranty-basics/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-06T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 8,
      "featured": true
    },
    {
      "id": "purchaser-dwelling-act-guide",
      "title": "Arizona Purchaser Dwelling Act — the notice-and-repair process before a lawsuit",
      "description": "A plain-English walkthrough of Arizona’s dwelling-action prerequisites under A.R.S. §§ 12-1361 through 12-1366, based on the current statutes.",
      "category": "process",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/purchaser-dwelling-act-guide/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 7,
      "featured": false
    },
    {
      "id": "arizona-roc-recovery-fund",
      "title": "Arizona ROC Recovery Fund — what new-home buyers can actually recover",
      "description": "A statute-based guide to the Residential Contractors’ Recovery Fund — $30,000 individual caps, $200,000 per license, ABC15-reported proration realities, and why it is not a substitute for documenting warranty claims early.",
      "category": "process",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/arizona-roc-recovery-fund/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-07T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 10,
      "featured": true
    },
    {
      "id": "builder-warranty-myths",
      "title": "Builder warranty myths Arizona buyers still hear",
      "description": "Fact-checks of common claims about inspections voiding coverage, punch lists, settling cracks, and what a limited warranty really means under Arizona law.",
      "category": "myths",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/builder-warranty-myths/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-07T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 9,
      "featured": true
    },
    {
      "id": "hoa-dwelling-actions-gallery-hovnanian",
      "title": "Can Arizona HOAs sue builders for construction defects? Gallery v. Hovnanian",
      "description": "Fact-check of Gallery Community Association v. K. Hovnanian — Arizona Court of Appeals held planned-community HOAs may bring HADA dwelling actions for common areas and exteriors they must maintain, plus reported Supreme Court follow-up coverage.",
      "category": "cases",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/hoa-dwelling-actions-gallery-hovnanian/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-05T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-05T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 10,
      "featured": true
    },
    {
      "id": "sb-1641-statute-of-repose-myth",
      "title": "Did Arizona cut the construction-defect deadline to four years? (SB 1641 myth)",
      "description": "Fact-check of claims that SB 1641 shortened Arizona’s A.R.S. § 12-552 statute of repose from eight years to four. Live azleg.gov text still shows eight years.",
      "category": "myths",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/sb-1641-statute-of-repose-myth/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-06T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-07T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 7,
      "featured": true
    },
    {
      "id": "sb-1450-condo-repose-proposal",
      "title": "Did Arizona just cut condo defect deadlines to five years? (SB 1450 proposal)",
      "description": "Fact-check of 2026 SB 1450 — a condominium-focused bill proposing a five-year statute of repose and two-thirds owner votes. Live A.R.S. § 12-552 still uses the eight/nine-year framework.",
      "category": "myths",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/sb-1450-condo-repose-proposal/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-07T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-07T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 8,
      "featured": true
    },
    {
      "id": "arizona-builder-defect-cases",
      "title": "Documented Arizona new-build defect disputes — what public records show",
      "description": "A sourced roundup of Arizona builder defect outcomes and local reporting, including Sun City Grand / Del Webb, ABC15 ROC complaint tallies, Lennar ROC process cases, Meritage community complaints, and the 2010 Pulte AG settlement.",
      "category": "cases",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/arizona-builder-defect-cases/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-05T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 15,
      "featured": true
    },
    {
      "id": "check-arizona-builder-roc-license",
      "title": "How to check an Arizona builder’s ROC license and complaint history",
      "description": "A practical guide to using the Arizona Registrar of Contractors public search before you buy — and while you are still inside warranty windows.",
      "category": "tools",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/check-arizona-builder-roc-license/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 5,
      "featured": false
    },
    {
      "id": "how-to-file-roc-complaint",
      "title": "How to file an Arizona ROC complaint about a new-home builder",
      "description": "A practical overview of the Arizona Registrar of Contractors complaint path for new construction, including the two-year deadline and what evidence helps.",
      "category": "process",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/how-to-file-roc-complaint/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 6,
      "featured": false
    },
    {
      "id": "research-arizona-new-home-builder",
      "title": "How to research an Arizona new-home builder before you close",
      "description": "A practical pre-closing research checklist — ROC license lookup, complaint history, warranty booklet red flags, inspection timing, and contract clauses that change dispute forums.",
      "category": "tools",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/research-arizona-new-home-builder/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 8,
      "featured": false
    },
    {
      "id": "research-arizona-new-home-communities",
      "title": "How to research an Arizona new-home community before you buy",
      "description": "A practical checklist for boom-market communities — from Teravalis, Artisan at Asante, Blossom Rock, Verrado, and Estrella to San Tan Valley masterplans and late-phase HOA exits — covering builders, ROC numbers, inspections, and local services.",
      "category": "guide",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/research-arizona-new-home-communities/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-07T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 12,
      "featured": true
    },
    {
      "id": "pre-closing-and-phase-inspections",
      "title": "Pre-drywall, pre-closing, and phase inspections for Arizona new builds",
      "description": "Why independent phase inspections matter in production housing — and how they fit Arizona warranty and ROC timelines after you move in.",
      "category": "guide",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/pre-closing-and-phase-inspections/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 6,
      "featured": false
    },
    {
      "id": "maricopa-province-meritage-hoa-exit",
      "title": "Province (Maricopa) and Meritage’s HOA exit — what local reporting documents",
      "description": "Fact-check of InMaricopa’s June 2025 Province community meeting coverage as Meritage Homes prepares to exit HOA control amid unfinished infrastructure complaints.",
      "category": "cases",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/maricopa-province-meritage-hoa-exit/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 6,
      "featured": true
    },
    {
      "id": "taylor-morrison-inspector-complaint",
      "title": "Taylor Morrison vs. a viral Arizona home inspector — what the public record shows",
      "description": "Fact-check of the 2024 Taylor Morrison complaint against inspector Cy Porter before the Arizona State Board of Technical Registration — and what it means for new-build buyers who want independent inspections.",
      "category": "cases",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/taylor-morrison-inspector-complaint/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 9,
      "featured": true
    },
    {
      "id": "ninety-day-notice-myth",
      "title": "The “90-day notice” myth in Arizona dwelling-defect claims",
      "description": "Why secondary websites still say Arizona buyers must wait 90 days before suing — and what A.R.S. § 12-1363 actually requires today (certified notice + 60-day seller response).",
      "category": "myths",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/ninety-day-notice-myth/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 6,
      "featured": true
    },
    {
      "id": "tucson-new-home-roof-defects",
      "title": "Tucson new-home roofs — what local inspectors told KGUN 9",
      "description": "Fact-checked summary of KGUN 9 reporting on underlayment failures, pre-move-in leaks, labor-shortage pressure, and builder limits on roof access for independent inspectors in Southern Arizona.",
      "category": "cases",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/tucson-new-home-roof-defects/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 7,
      "featured": false
    },
    {
      "id": "arizona-top-builders-roc-complaints",
      "title": "What ABC15 found when it compared ROC complaints for Arizona’s busiest builders",
      "description": "Fact-checked roundup of ABC15’s Let Joe Know reporting on Phoenix-metro permit volume and Registrar of Contractors complaint counts for Pulte, Meritage, Lennar, Taylor Morrison, and D.R. Horton.",
      "category": "cases",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/arizona-top-builders-roc-complaints/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 7,
      "featured": true
    },
    {
      "id": "eleven-month-warranty-inspection",
      "title": "Why Arizona new-home owners schedule an 11-month warranty inspection",
      "description": "How desert climate, latent defects, and builder claim windows make the month-11 inspection one of the highest-leverage steps after closing.",
      "category": "guide",
      "url": "https://azhomeshield.com/learn/eleven-month-warranty-inspection/",
      "pubDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "updatedDate": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
      "readingMinutes": 5,
      "featured": false
    }
  ],
  "routes": [
    {
      "path": "/",
      "title": "Home — AZ HomeShield app + education entry"
    },
    {
      "path": "/learn/",
      "title": "Learn hub — fact-checked Arizona warranty articles"
    },
    {
      "path": "/builders/",
      "title": "Arizona builders directory — brands, legal entities, ROC numbers"
    },
    {
      "path": "/neighborhoods/",
      "title": "Arizona new-home neighborhoods — builders, home counts, local stats"
    },
    {
      "path": "/tools/",
      "title": "Tools hub — myth checker, deadline calculator, documentation checklist"
    },
    {
      "path": "/tools/myth-checker/",
      "title": "Builder warranty myth checker"
    },
    {
      "path": "/tools/warranty-deadline/",
      "title": "Warranty deadline calculator"
    },
    {
      "path": "/tools/documentation-checklist/",
      "title": "Documentation checklist"
    },
    {
      "path": "/for-ai/",
      "title": "Agent citation index — not linked in consumer navigation"
    },
    {
      "path": "/knowledge/arizona-warranty-facts.json",
      "title": "Machine-readable warranty facts JSON"
    },
    {
      "path": "/knowledge/arizona-builders.json",
      "title": "Machine-readable Arizona builders + ROC directory JSON"
    },
    {
      "path": "/knowledge/arizona-neighborhoods.json",
      "title": "Machine-readable Arizona neighborhoods directory JSON"
    },
    {
      "path": "/llms.txt",
      "title": "llms.txt discovery file"
    },
    {
      "path": "/.well-known/llms.txt",
      "title": "Well-known llms.txt mirror"
    },
    {
      "path": "/llms-full.txt",
      "title": "llms-full.txt condensed knowledge file"
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "path": "/tools/myth-checker/",
      "title": "Builder warranty myth checker"
    },
    {
      "path": "/tools/warranty-deadline/",
      "title": "Warranty deadline calculator"
    },
    {
      "path": "/tools/documentation-checklist/",
      "title": "Documentation checklist"
    }
  ],
  "relatedFeeds": [
    {
      "path": "/knowledge/arizona-builders.json",
      "title": "Arizona builders directory JSON"
    },
    {
      "path": "/builders/",
      "title": "Arizona builders directory (HTML)"
    },
    {
      "path": "/knowledge/arizona-neighborhoods.json",
      "title": "Arizona neighborhoods directory JSON"
    },
    {
      "path": "/neighborhoods/",
      "title": "Arizona neighborhoods directory (HTML)"
    }
  ]
}